The recent assassination attempt on former President Trump has put an unavoidable spotlight on the often-toxic nature of American politics and political discourse. As the attempted assassination resonates beyond the political sphere, it becomes pertinent for employers, HR managers, and team leads to address it thoughtfully within the workplace. Here we explore how to approach such discussions, balancing sensitivity with the need to maintain a cohesive work environment.
Addressing the Assassination Attempt
Some issues are hard to ignore, even if they stray into the kind of political and religious discussion we’re often cautioned to avoid. The assassination attempt may be one of these issues.
However, before deciding to weigh in or make a statement of any kind, it’s important to consider how best to do this in alignment with your company’s mission, vision, values, and history of engaging in political or social issue discussion.
Keep in mind that when done well, these kinds of communications can demonstrate a commitment to supporting democracy and civic participation, which are foundational to a stable society.
What to Say and What Not to Say
What you say will obviously also have an impact on how the messaging is received. Keep in mind that we live, and work, in a very polarized environment these days. While most rhetoric around the assassination attempt has been subdued, it’s important to avoid treading into areas of sensitivity.
Clear and thoughtful communication is crucial. Key messages should include a strong condemnation of political violence and well wishes for those affected. Emphasize the importance of mutual respect, finding common ground, and showing compassion for differing viewpoints.
It’s also important to consider what not to say.
“We would also advise against any commentary on the behavior of political actors, even if you’re trying to be neutral,” advises Charles Chesnut and Ethan McCarty in an article for Integral. “What you think is neutral can easily be perceived as ‘false equivalence’ by interested parties.”
For example, Chesnut and McCarty suggest avoiding statements like:
- “There has been inflammatory language from both sides”
- “We hope both candidates will…”
- Quotations from any politician’s call for unity, even if the words themselves are harmless. Some will question why you chose that person’s words instead of someone else’s.
Navigating the Coming Months
As political tensions may persist, provide guidance on handling ongoing discussions. Offer resources for managing workplace politics and employee stress. Encourage open dialogue, but within a framework that promotes respect and understanding.
In times of political turmoil, the way organizations address sensitive events can significantly impact workplace dynamics. Thoughtful communication fosters a supportive and respectful environment, reinforcing the organization’s values and commitment to its employees. By navigating these discussions carefully, employers can maintain cohesion and morale, even amidst external challenges.
Lin Grensing-Pophal is a Contributing Editor at HR Daily Advisor.
The post <strong>Whether and How to Address the Attempted Assassination at Work</strong> appeared first on HR Daily Advisor.